> A 3-5% ratio of our email is getting tagged with HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32 which > according to the DOC is HTML: images with 2800-3200 bytes of words. The
Yes, it's the message size that's in question, not the "<img>" tag. it's expected that the rule may fire on ham -- that's why it only scores 1.6 points (max). 1.6 is far below the 5.0 threshold...
Thank you. That explains it then. I suppose there is no fix for the false positives then? Since its the total message size. I began thinking that maybe it was a \n versus a \r issue as most of the emails being tagged that way had \n for the line breaks instead of \r hard returns.
James
