On Thursday 25 January 2007 12:33, Nigel Frankcom wrote: >On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:20:09 -0500, Gene Heskett > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >>>On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >>>> I got this email from Rules_Du_Jour this morning, what is the fix? >>> >>>Don't take this the wrong way, but did you read the errors at all? >>> >>>> Lint output: [16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: >>>> README: [16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: >>>> WARNING: YOU HAVE DOWNLOADED THIS RULESET from COMCAST. I am >>>> TERMINATING THIS ACCOUNT. [16404] warn: config: failed to parse >>>> line, skipping: Someone else will eventually have control of this >>>> webspace, possibly a malicious spammer. [16404] warn: config: failed >>>> to parse line, skipping: STOP using RDJ on this file *NOW* >>>> [16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Also, make >>>> note of the fact that this file is for users of SA 2.64 and below. >>> >>>It makes it pretty clear that you should stop using it and why. >> >>Yes I did read it, but I'm not sure what rule I should remove, or if I >>should stop using rulesdujour. Has it fallen out of favor or was it >> too good for somebody? >> >>FWIW, rulesdujour, if its complaining about a package, should not only >> say its an out of date package, but should name it so that one can >> find and remove it! This message didn't arrive until after this one >> this morning: >> >>Matt Kettler's AntiDrug has changed on coyote.coyote.den. >>Version line: # rev 0.65 10/01/2006 - updated URL, etc >> >>So I assume that's the file being bitched about, so I've removed >> several of them in the /etc/spamassassin/rulesdujour dir, and removed >> the antidrug thing from /etc/rulesdujour/config. >> >>Damn I get enough of that, some of them claim I could get it up if I >> was 100 years old. But I'm diabetic & 72, so the chances are >> somewhere between damned slim and none. > >What else is in your RDJ config? It might be worth taking a walk >through the rules site and just checking what you've got and what, if >any have been obfuscated. > >Kind regards > >Nigel TRUSTED_RULESETS="EVILNUMBERS EVILNUMBERS1 EVILNUMBERS2 BOGUSVIRUS SARE_ADULT SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM SARE_BML SARE_CODING SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 SARE_GENLSUBJ SARE_UNSUB SARE_HEADER0 SARE_HEADER2 SARE_OBFU0 SARE_OBFU1 SARE_OEM SARE_RANDOM SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1 SARE_URI3 SARE_URI_ENG SARE_WHITELIST SARE_WHITELIST_SPF SARE_WHITELIST_RCVD SARE_SPECIFIC SARE_STOCKS SARE_FRAUD SARE_SPOOF ZMI_GERMAN" SA_DIR="/etc/mail/spamassassin" MAIL_ADDRESS="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" SA_RESTART="killall -HUP spamd"
-- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2007 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
