Matthew Wilson wrote: > - Full, tested, supportable multithreaded support > - Full, tested, supportable support for an asynchronous I/O model > (a la qpsmtpd-async)
I think effort could be better spent elsewhere. Spam checking lands itself ideally to running parallel individual processes, with little if any interaction between them. For an individual user a reduction in processing latency from three to one seconds doesn't mean a thing. For an entire mail filtering system all that matters is its througput (messages per hour). Multithreading brings no performance benefits in this area. Mark
