David Goldsmith wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Here is how this message scored:
X-Spam-DCC: PacNet-SG: iceman11.giac.net 1358; Body=65 Fuz1=65 Fuz2=51
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on iceman11.giac.net
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_90_100,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY,PLING_PLING
autolearn=no
version=3.1.8
X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.1 HTML_90_100 BODY: Message is 90% to 100% HTML
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.0000]
* 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
* 0.0 MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY 'Content-Type' found without required MIME
* headers
* 0.3 PLING_PLING Subject has lots of exclamation marks
Here is a URL for the message:
http://members.cox.net/dgoldsmi/spam/lowscore02a.eml
Maybe I just got "lucky" and was an early recipient of it. None of the
message hash sites have seen it enough yet to assign points.
Does this message break 5.0 points for anyone?
Yep -
Content analysis details: (9.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
1.1 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image
area
0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
2.2 MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY 'Content-Type' found without required MIME
headers
0.7 PLING_PLING Subject has lots of exclamation marks
Still rocking SA 2.64 with incredible results ;)
-Jim
