> > So you are saying that I have to train SA?
>
> That would be how you would improve your Bayes accuracy, yes.
I have trained SA on my server but I still get a score lower than 5.0..
Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
1.7 SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3 BODY: Last week's hot stock scam
0.1 HTML_TEXT_AFTER_BODY BODY: HTML contains text after BODY close
tag
2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95%
[score: 0.8738]
0.4 HTML_30_40 BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
while on another server (that I have instructed with the same messages)
I get:
Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
1.7 SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3 BODY: Last week's hot stock scam
0.1 HTML_TEXT_AFTER_BODY BODY: HTML contains text after BODY close
tag
0.4 HTML_30_40 BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to
100%
[score: 0.9996]
0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
what it can be the reason of the different score assigned?
why the second system doesn't assign an AWL score?
rocsca
