Hi, Raymond, I don't have any URIBL rules firing up (SA 3.2.0 from
source here, most of the other relevant info is in the header of the
mail I sent before to test). Where did you get them?
Thanks,
Luis
2007/6/8, Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi!
> They aren't scoring very much here...
>
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@domain.com
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by nahuel.biol.unlp.edu.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660BE7B1FE;
> Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:25:09 -0300 (ART)
X-Prolocation-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
score=14.999, required 5, BAD_URI 1.50, CM_META_HK_NOW 2.50,
CM_SPACED_DATE 0.50, PROLO_BLACK_DNSBL 3.00,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.50, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 1.50,
RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50, SPF_PASS -0.00, URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.00)
Allmost 15, not bad i think.
Bye,
Raymond.
--
-------------------------------------------------
GNU-GPL: "May The Source Be With You...
Linux Registered User #448382.
When I grow up, I wanna be like Theo...
-------------------------------------------------
