> >>On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote: > >>>Any idea for qmail?
> >Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >>if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better > >>MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions... > Jim Maul escribió: > >According to who, you? > > > >He asked for a solution for qmail. If you do not know, it would be > >better to just not respond than to suggest he swap out his whole setup. That's why asked for excusing a bit of irony. Btw. courier mail server is in configuration very close to qmail. With qmail you have to patch/replace most of its content to get features that are in most of MTAs, and you will still have some unwelcome features... On 30.07.07 14:10, Diego Pomatta wrote: > LoL. qmail rocks. yes, google for "qmail bugs and withlist" for more info. > That said, I use qmail -> simscan -> spamassassin. > Although in my case I silently drop spam at smtp time, simscan can be > configured to reject and return the spam mail to the sender with an > error message, which can be customized. return to who? reject message at SMTP time? Or return to "From:" or "mail from:" address, which is in 99.9% fake? That's why it's unwelcome to "return" spam. Btw, can simscan drop the spam verbosely? I mean, will your users report their mail rejected because of "550 spam refused" or it just won't come to its destination? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Save the whales. Collect the whole set.
