Re: some of you have bad meta rules...

[Jari Fredriksson]

> On Friday 10 August 2007, Loren Wilton wrote:
>>> [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has
>>> undefined dependency 'SARE_RD_SAFE_MKSHRT'
>>> [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has
>>> undefined dependency 'SARE_RD_SAFE_GT'
>>> [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has
>>> undefined dependency 'SARE_RD_SAFE_TINY'
>>> [10637] info: rules: meta test HS_PHARMA_1 has
>>> dependency 'HS_SUBJ_ONLINE_PHARMACEUTICAL' with a zero
>>> score [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND
>>> has undefined dependency 'SARE_XMAIL_SUSP2'
>>> [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has
>>> undefined dependency 'SARE_HEAD_XAUTH_WARN'
>>> [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has
>>> undefined dependency 'X_AUTH_WARN_FAKED'
>> 
> 
> I'm getting some of those too Loren, since the 3.2.3
> update a couple of days ago, done by smart.

Same list here, 3.2.3 via cpan, sa-updated & sa-compiled.