Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Pawe³ Têcza wrote on Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:28:05 +0200: [...] > But the second >> is rather Spamassassin's job. >> >> I'm thinking whether it's really necessary to keep *all* tokens >> for that kind of spam... Maybe Spamassassin could save only >> some part of them? What's your opinion about it? > > I really don't know enough about Bayes and SA to say much about it. I > think it would be difficult for SA to determine what are "good" and "bad" > tokens.
Yes, it can be difficult to determine, but what about configureable plugin option for maximum number of tokens per message to store? If it doesn't exist yet, of course ;) Pawel
