On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:43:00 +0200 (CEST), Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > >> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Dag Wieers wrote: >> >> > That said, I wouldn't mind removing spfquery from one of the packages in >> > order to allow both packages to be co-installed. I would prefer to remove >> > it from perl-Mail-SPF-Query. Anyone minds ? >> >> Isn't that counter intuitive? The package name after all suggests .... SPF >> Query? > >Right, but the tool in perl-Mail-SPF-Query is from february 2006, while >the one from perl-Mail-SPF is from may 2007. > >Besides the name is not always the best indication. At least perl-Mail-SPF >is a more correct and complete implementation and therefor is more likely >to provide better results. > >I still ship spfquery and spfd from perl-Mail-SPF-Query, but in >/usr/share/doc/ instead. I'd agree with the removal of perl-Mail-SPF-Query, as has been pointed out to me by Michael Mansour... "since it's already been announced by the author that it will _never_ be updated again, since as mentioned earlier, Mail::SPF follows RFC and should be migrated to by anyone using Mail::SPF::Query." This is cross posted to the SA list to see what comment it brings from there. Hopefully some of the SA admins are on this list and I won't have to re-cover the entire thread :-D Kind regards Nigel
