John D. Hardin wrote:
score URIBL_SBL 5
Discussion of the advisability of a single poison-pill rule is for
another day, though if you *do* want to spamcan everything that hits
SBL you'd be better served doing it at the MTA layer as a regular
DNSBL test.
Also, isn't SBL folded into Zen these days?
The rule in question is a URIBL test, so it acts on domain names that
appear in the message body. A standard DNSBL block at the MTA level,
whether just using the SBL or using Zen, would act on the IP address of
the sending server.
It's not just a matter of one method being more efficient than the
other. They're looking at different data.
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net>
