Hello!

I have gotten several emails over the past 3 weeks with a really crazy AWL 
score.  Here's the headers from a message with a 4138 AWL score.

Where should I begin looking for this one?

Thanx!

-Michael

=======================================================

Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-gw.alliednational.com ([172.16.30.12])
        by apps-3.alliednational.com with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:55:30 -0600
Received: from mail-gw.alliednational.com (mail-gw.alliednational.com 
[127.0.0.1])
        by mail-gw.alliednational.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA0E32DF3
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  8 Jan 2008 18:55:26 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by mail-gw.alliednational.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id m090tMh8012626
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:55:22 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: mail-gw.alliednational.com: filter set sender to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on
        mail-gw.alliednational.com
X-Spam-Level: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4049.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,COMBINED_FROM,
        FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD2,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD3,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD4,HTML_50_60,
        HTML_COLOR_FFFFFF,HTML_FONT_BIG,MY_SENT2U,OACYS_HASH,USER_IN_WHITELIST
        autolearn=disabled version=3.1.8
X-Spam-Report: 
        *  0.3 COMBINED_FROM Evil froms
        * -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list
        *  0.8 MY_SENT2U BODY: Tells me how the message was sent to me.
        *  1.0 OACYS_HASH BODY: Looks like uw2915ph74o7nn60ik858hd64
        *  0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
        *  0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML tag for a big font size
        *  4.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
        *      [score: 1.0000]
        *  3.0 HTML_COLOR_FFFFFF RAW: Uses spammers favorite font color
        *  0.3 FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD3 Contains multiple odd letter combinations
        *  1.1 FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD2 Contains multiple odd letter combinations
        *  0.3 FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD4 Contains multiple odd letter combinations
        * 4138 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Received: from interact.novell.com (jarvis.provo.novell.com [137.65.244.88])
        by mail-gw.alliednational.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A5332DE8
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  8 Jan 2008 18:55:21 -0600 (CST)
Received: from minuet.provo.novell.com ([::ffff:137.65.246.40])
        by interact.novell.com with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:04:09 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:54:50 -0700 (MST)
From: Novell Patch Notification <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: %%SPAM%% (4049.2) 08 JAN 2008 Novell Customer Center (1 New Patch)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
        boundary="----=_Part_337650_26873607.1199825748880"
X-Spam-Prev-Subject: 08 JAN 2008 Novell Customer Center (1 New Patch)

------=_Part_337650_26873607.1199825748880
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

08 JAN 2008 Novell Customer Center (1 New Patch)



E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any associated
file(s) may contain privileged, confidential or proprietary information
or be protected from disclosure under law ("Confidential Information").
Any use or disclosure of this Confidential Information, or taking any
action in reliance thereon, by any individual/entity other than the
intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited.  This Confidential
Information is intended solely for the use of the
individual(s) addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, you have
received this Confidential Information in error and have an obligation
to promptly inform the sender and permanently destroy, in its entirety,
this Confidential Information (and all copies thereof).  E-mail is
handled in the strictest of confidence by Allied National, however,
unless sent encrypted, it is not a secure communication method and may
have been intercepted, edited or altered during transmission and
therefore is not guaranteed.

Reply via email to