On 18/03/2008 1:39 PM, Spam Admin wrote: > Spam Admin wrote: >> Yes, the hardware is identical. The MX records are both '10', and the >> volume of mail is slightly LESS on the 3.2.4 machine over the 3.1.9 >> it's taking more time to process less mail on the newer machine.
- are you running the same config on both (bayes, awl, sql, etc) - what's your maximum message size? 3.2 will process large messages slower - is spamd taking up the CPU time or is it your MTA queuing taking up CPU time? 3.2.3+ will wait longer for DNS responses, decreasing throughput per child but not increasing CPU time per message If you describe *how* you're using SA someone might have some more suggestions. Daryl
