On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Mar 28, 2008, at 6:21 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 06:09:03PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> I think that mail from self to self should be ignored by the AWL.
> (it's harder to forged mail from a regular correspondent, so this
> makes AWL more useful)
If you know the mail is from you, don't waste the resources scanning the
message at all.
This was a spam I'm talking about.
I'm not worried about mail from self to self. I'm annoying because AWL is
decreasing forged spam score so far that the SPF failure doesn't catch.
If you don't scan mails that you know originated from you, then they won't
affect AWL for a forged message...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...every time I sit down in front of a Windows machine I feel as
if the computer is just a place for the manufacturers to put their
advertising. -- fwadling on Y! SCOX
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Today: April Fools' day
