> From: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:51 +0100
> To: Jack Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Need help with bobax rules
> 
> 
> for what it's worth, I just pushed Henry's version of Joe's rules into the
> 3.2.x sa-updates.

But did someone sign them right ?

[49696] dbg: gpg: release trusted key id list:
5E541DC959CB8BAC7C78DFDC4056A61A5244EC45
26C900A46DD40CD5AD24F6D7DEE01987265FA05B
0C2B1D7175B852C64B3CDC716C55397824F434CE

49696] dbg: channel: selected mirror http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf

[49657] dbg: gpg: gpg: Signature made Wed Apr 16 04:28:44 2008 CDT using RSA
key ID 24F434CE
[49657] dbg: gpg: gpg: WARNING: signing subkey 24F434CE is not
cross-certified
[49657] dbg: gpg: gpg: please see
http://www.gnupg.org/faq/subkey-cross-certify.html for more information
[49657] dbg: gpg: [GNUPG:] ERRSIG 6C55397824F434CE 1 2 00 1208338124 1
[49657] dbg: gpg: gpg: Can't check signature: General error
error: GPG validation failed!
The update downloaded successfully, but the GPG signature verification
failed.
channel: GPG validation failed, channel failed
[49657] dbg: generic: cleaning up temporary directory/files
[49657] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 4


-- 
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>|SECNAP Network Security
Winner 2008 Network Products Guide Hot Companies
FreeBSD SpamAssassin Ports maintainer

 
> --j.
> 
> Jack Pepper writes:
>> Quoting Jeremy Fairbrass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 
>>> HI Jack,
>>> Any chance of sharing your rules for this?!
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jeremy
>> 
>> Sure:
>> 
>> score BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2 1.800
>> header BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2   ALL =~
>> /^Message-Id:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/m
>> describe BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2   Has Bobax Generated Message-Id, type 2
>> 
>> score BOBAX_GEN_SPAM 1.800
>> header BOBAX_GEN_SPAM   ALL =~ /^Message-Id:.*EJXVWDA/m
>> describe BOBAX_GEN_SPAM   Has Bobax Generated Message-Id
>> 
>> One fellow suggested that it might be more efficient to do this:
>> 
>> score BOBAX_GEN_SPAM 1.800
>> header BOBAX_GEN_SPAM   Message-ID =~ /EJXVWDA/m
>> describe BOBAX_GEN_SPAM   Has Bobax Generated Message-Id
>> 
>> but I wasn't sure if SA would detect that the incorrect case on the
>> word "message-id" and then not realize the test, etc.  Any suggestions?
>> 
>> jp
>> 
>> -- 
>> Framework?  I don't need no steenking framework!
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> @fferent Security Labs:  Isolate/Insulate/Innovate
>> http://www.afferentsecurity.com
> 

_________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(tm). 
For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com
_________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to