I'm not sure if it's a zombie or not. I've received 3 spam from this place within 2 days. If I've received the spam, I know my users have received it even more as that was the pattern in the past.
It's not listed on any of the RBLs yet. ________________________________ From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:12 AM To: Johnson, S; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Oh ohh. grey listing starting to fail From: "Johnson, S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:27:33 -0500 To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org> Conversation: Oh ohh. grey listing starting to fail Subject: Oh ohh. grey listing starting to fail After months of doing a great job, I started to get spam back into my system again. Apr 23 16:26:06 mail sqlgrey: grey: new: 82.67.64.191(82.67.64.191), [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 23 16:26:06 mail postfix/smtpd[23130]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mut38-1-82-67-64-191.fbx.proxad.net[82.67.64.191]: 450 4.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sender address rejected: Greylisted for 5 minutes; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=SMTP helo=<wzbkw.proxad.net> It sucks that they are now starting to re-queue their stupid spam; why don't they GET A CLUE that we don't want their [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone have an idea on how I can help shore this up? Greylisting only works for 'zombies'. Real MTA's will requeue. (are you saying this is a zombie? On pbl.spamhaus.org ? ________________________________ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(tm). For Information please see www.spammertrap.com ________________________________ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean.
