On Sat, 03 May 2008 12:51:32 -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>    Hello Guys,
>
>    im running SA 3.2.4 and, on the same machine, horde/imp as webmail 
>application.
>
>    Sometimes, mails sent through imp are getting flagged as SPAM 
>because of RBL checks, for example:
>
>Content analysis details:   (8.4 points, 8.0 required)
>
> pts rule name              description
>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> 0.3 TVD_RCVD_SINGLE        TVD_RCVD_SINGLE
> 3.0 BOTNET_IPINHOSTNAME    Hostname contains its own IP address
>[botnet_ipinhosntame,ip=201.67.93.102,rdns=201-67-93-102.gnace704.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br]
> 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
> 5.0 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
>                            [201.67.93.102 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
> 0.1 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS
>
>
>
>Content analysis details:   (11.7 points, 8.0 required)
>
> pts rule name              description
>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> 5.0 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
>                            [201.11.150.2 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
> 5.0 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL

Before you worry about whitelisting your own stuff, the Spamhaus
listing would need to be resolved. 

If you are on a static IP you might ask your isp to supply an rdns
entry and then attempt to get things resolved with Spamhaus.

If you do both of those you will probably not hit either of the issues
you show above (and below).

> 1.6 TVD_RCVD_IP            TVD_RCVD_IP
> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
> 0.1 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS
>
>
>    Well .... in fact i would like my webmail sent applications to be 
>considered 'trusted' and not pass through SA rules, but i dont know how 
>to do that. I think i'm having this kind of behavior because IMP is 
>inserting Received: headers with real ip users apparently when remote IP 
>has reverse and always with X-Originating-IP
>
>(with remote IP address as X-Originating-IP)
>
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from  ( [unknown]) by correio.solutti.com.br (Horde MIME library)
>    with HTTP; Sat, 03 May 2008 11:34:55 -0300
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 11:34:55 -0300
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: proposta comercial
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>    boundary="=_1j9plxzuetq8"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3)
>X-Originating-IP: 201.67.93.102
>X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
>    .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
>
>
>
>(with remote IP address sa Received: header)
>
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from 201-11-150-2.gnace702.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br
>    (201-11-150-2.gnace702.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [201.11.150.2]) by
>    correio.solutti.com.br (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sat, 03 May 2008
>    12:22:55 -0300
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 12:22:55 -0300
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: teste
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>    boundary="=_2pwudsfd55c0"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3)
>X-Originating-IP: 201.11.150.2
>X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; Alexa;
>    rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14
>
>
>
>    Question is ... how would be the correct way of whitelisting my 
>local sent messages through webmail ?

Reply via email to