> On Tue, May 13, 2008 15:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > Don't wonder if anyone will reject or flag your e-mail because havinr "+all" > > in SPF
On 13.05.08 21:29, Benny Pedersen wrote: > yes i need to implement srs to fix it better ? no, forwarders need to. > come on, srs and +all it imho the same seen to the recipient it's not, they are much different. > diff is that i dont use srs installed anywhere > > fact: > v=spf1 +all < this is bad ! > v=spf1 mx +all < this is not > > if admins see them as equal, blame them spammers will use whatever they'll see people don't catch. you just told all spammers to use "mx +all" in SPF records for their domains to be able to use them for world-wide spamming -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside...
