On Fri, 16 May 2008, Jeff Aitken wrote:

I'm thinking you're probably right that this is a timing issue. I just checked another message that had different scoring results. The initial message was received on 5/15 at 1156UTC and did not hit URIBL_BLACK. I fed it to SA manually at 1203UTC and it DID hit URIBL_BLACK. I looked up the URI in question and it was listed on 5/15 at 1153UTC.

One argument for implementing greylisting?

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  You do not examine legislation in the light of the benefits it
  will convey if properly administered, but in the light of the
  wrongs it would do and the harms it would cause if improperly
  administered.                                  -- Lyndon B. Johnson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 5 days until the 4th anniversary of SpaceshipOne winning the X-prize

Reply via email to