> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: > > > > one does need to score viruses in SA if (s)he can reject them directly > > > > On 02.07.08 09:27, Robert - elists wrote: > > > Yes, we do that. > > > > > > See the SA clamav plugin > > > > no, you do not do that. See the clamav-milter or other apropriate program. > > SA is very CPU intensive so it's better to scan with clamav directly, > > instead of using SA clamav plugin
On 03.07.08 09:57, Justin Mason wrote: > No, it's entirely appropriate to use the ClamAV plugin, if you want to do > so. If you use the shortcircuit plugin, you won't be wasting much CPU > time -- just that required to parse out the attachment parts -- and it > allows you the flexibility to rescue FPs (which are particularly common on > their phishing rules). Well, only if the OP thinks so. There was other solution (two differently configured clamav daemons) described, not by the OP. what I wanted was to propose using clamav directly which may only tagging the viruses is risky because uneducated users could execute them... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Remember half the people you know are below average.
