On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Richard Frovarp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jake Maul wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I've recently been getting more simple drug-related spam that has no
>> real obfuscation and often doesn't get flagged with anything other
>> than HTML_MESSAGE (0.0) and BAYES_XX (generally 50-99).
>>
>> A few sample Subject lines:
>>
>> Subject: Use Generik Viagra and forget about your sexual nightmares.
>> Subject: Discounted Super Viagra, Viagra Pro and Soft Cialis
>> Subject: Viagra Pro will save your from sexual hardships.
>> Subject: Any medication without prescription. Visa and MasterCard accepted
>> Subject: EZ order and fast delivery of your drugs
>> Subject: {SPAM?} You'll get harder erections with Soft Viagra.
>>
>
> Are spammers finally learning that to get past spam filters they should send
> normal looking messages?I hope it's just a phase. I mean, can't they just send spam engineered to hit lots of SpamAssassin rules? That would be a lot easier on us than having to continually come up with new rules, statistical analyses, etc... :)
