On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:11 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anybody have any experience with this product? >
It appears *noone* has any experience with it... Google finds only 2 links and they are on the company's own homepage. > My company wants to replace SpamAssassin with this product, due to > SpamAssassin being not being up to par other products. What is the evidence for this statement? I move customers from commercial solutions to my company's SA based filtering regularly and they are typically very impressed with what we can do for them with Spamassassin. > > My argument is that people we give SpamAssassin to have no clue how to use > it and what it's designed to do, therefore they think it sucks. > Why would your users even need to know you are using SA? How are they supposed to "use" it? Just configure it to make spam go away and they should be OK with that. You can set up some sort of quarantine or tagging system but people generally aren't going to use it much. > > > >From what I can find of the company behind this Magic thing, it looks like their products are repackaged open source software. (Their "MagicMail" product appears to be qmail). There's a pretty decent change they are selling you Spamassassin anyway :)
