> I realize that it is malformed - shouldn't have non FQDN's in the a: or > mx: types, and male.example.com doesn't have an mx record (it is the mx > for 'example.com'). But that being said, those ones that are valid > ought to be recognized. > A gentle suggestion to the SPF owner to visit
http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html to validate and fix his SPF record might help both him and you. Martin
