Karl Pearson a écrit : > On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >>> On Fri, October 10, 2008 17:05, Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote: >>>> any email with a FROM as coming from our domain but is not a user >>>> (left >>>> of @ sign) that isn't one of these X addresses? >> >> On 10.10.08 21:01, Benny Pedersen wrote: >>> what rule gives -100 ? >> >> whitelist, of course: "any email with a FROM as coming from our domain" >> That's common mistake of adding local domain to whitelist_from, often >> used >> by spammers to get mail through. >> >>> there is a number of ways to make sure its not giveing -100 to own >>> domains >>> that is sent outside of localhost or even from localhost olso >>> >>> adjust the score -100 to something like -0.01 and make use of >>> dkim/spf to >>> compensate for real users thar send correct not just have your >>> domain in >>> sender from >> >> simply using whitelist_auth or whitelist_from_rcvd instead of >> whitelist_from >> should be enough > > I use whitelist_from_rcvd but am not sure I use it right: > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ourldsfamily.com > > Is that right?
In general, yes. This wouldn't be right if ourldsfamily.com is a large domain with "bad" clients. for example, you wouldn't do that with a (large) ISP. > > Also, I've never heard of whitelist_auth and am curious to see an > example. Would using both _auth and _from_rcvd be good/better/worse? whitelist_auth whitelists the message under SPF or DKIM or DK success. The right combination depends on the domain.
