On Wednesday 26 November 2008 2:18 pm, Lists wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The system here is getting heaps of variations of this night of pleasure
> spam. Some is getting stopped by spamassassin but still quite a bit
> getting through.
> Here is an example of one that only scored low.
> http://www.pastebin.ca/1267866
>
> If anybody has time to run it through their system and tell me what t
> hit on for them - or if someone knows a ruleset that I could implement
> to better stop these it would be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Kate

Here is how one I received scores on my stand-alone box:

Content analysis details:   (23.6 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.9 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
                            [79.52.75.164 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 3.0 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
 5.0 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
                            [score: 0.9998]
 1.0 RELAYED_BY_DIALUP      Sent directly from dynamic IP address
 0.4 URI_HEX                URI: URI hostname has long hexadecimal sequence
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 2.2 DCC_CHECK              listed in DCC (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/)
                            [cpollock 1117; Body=many Fuz1=many]
                            [Fuz2=many]
  10 CLAMAV                 Clam AntiVirus detected a virus
 0.1 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to trusted network by host with
                            dynamic-looking rDNS
 1.0 SAGREY                 Adds 1.0 to spam from first-time senders

Chris

-- 
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C

Attachment: pgpS0oP8xUNtu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to