I noticed this morning that I also had 0 ixhash hits. Is something wrong?
Rose, Bobby wrote:
Has anyone who switched to 1.5 of iXHash received any hits? I haven't seen any
since switching. One thing that I've noticed is if I pass the same message
thru SA using the old iXhash, the hash is computed via Method 1 and 2, if I use
1.5 of iXhash, it's only computed using method 2
On one box I have SA with 1.5 and another I have SA and 1.01 and the box with
1.01 version has tripped about 5 messages since switching it back.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dirk Bonengel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 8:55 AM
To: Arthur Dent; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: New version of iXhash plugin available
Arthur Dent schrieb:
[
CUT]
Hmmm.. OK I tried another one. This one actually triggered iXhash when I
got
it originally. You can see the original mail (including headers showing
iXhash
report) here:
http://pastebin.ca/1269211
Running it through now it doesn't generate the error that the
other message did, BUT... it doesn't trigger iXhash anymore!
That mail's somewhat older, isn't it? So it may simple have been removed
from Ctyme's (and the other's) data. It doesn't trigger here as well.
Here's the debug output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamSamples]$ spamassassin -D IXHASH < watchtv.txt
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Using iXhash plugin
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying ctyme.ixhash.net
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #1 not computed, requirements not met
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Computed hash-value
e82057ad6c568847f62357498f0dd4db via
method 2, using perl exclusively
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
e82057ad6c568847f62357498f0dd4db.ctyme.ixhash.net
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #3 not computed, requirements not met
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying hosteurope.ixhash.net
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #1 not computed, requirements not met
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
e82057ad6c568847f62357498f0dd4db.hosteurope.ixhash.net
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value for method #2 found in metadata,
re-using that
one
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
e82057ad6c568847f62357498f0dd4db.hosteurope.ixhash.net
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #3 not computed, requirements not met
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying generic.ixhash.net
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #1 not computed, requirements not met
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
e82057ad6c568847f62357498f0dd4db.generic.ixhash.net
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value for method #2 found in metadata,
re-using that
one
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
e82057ad6c568847f62357498f0dd4db.generic.ixhash.net
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #3 not computed, requirements not met
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: IxHash querying ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #1 not computed, requirements not met
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
e82057ad6c568847f62357498f0dd4db.ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value for method #2 found in metadata,
re-using that
one
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Now checking
e82057ad6c568847f62357498f0dd4db.ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
[15993] dbg: IXHASH: Hash value #3 not computed, requirements not met
From ... [Headers and spam report removed]....
This all looks OK to me.
Just keep an eye to your spam flow and see if you get any hits (that
would most likely hit @ ix.dnsbl.manitu.net - Heise's list would be the
biggest one)
