Dennis Hardy wrote on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:36:59 -0800 (PST): > see http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=Glossary#233
Ah. I know a lot of spam terms, but this is certainly new to me ;-) > > > If the former, put some example up on a pastebin (not ehre!). > > Yes already done: http://pastebin.com/m4400a74d As it doesn't contain any headers I don't know if I wouldn't have rejected it at MTA, anyway. I get: X-Spam-Report: * 5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% * [score: 1.0000] * 3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist * [URIs: twolumpsofcoal.net] * 0.1 DIET_1 BODY: Lose Weight Spam It may not have been in URIBL_BLACK at the time you got it. But there are two other good rules that hit on it. As you are getting BAYES_05 there's something wrong with your Bayes I'd say. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
