Rops schrieb:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm an end user trying to figure out, why too many messages arrive
> erratically stamped as spam.
> Please could anyone explain, why the normally looking ordinary daily
> business mail was classified as Spam?
> 
> Thank you!

look this line

amavisd-new at estpak.ee

looks like estpak.ee
does the spam scanning
so your question should go to the admin of this server
that he might give a deeper analysis
an get down with spam points giving by
FUZZY_OCR

the detecting spam rules look like
matching to images/gifs etc in the mail
see fuzzy_ocr images rules

mostly comming from using
small images ( gifs etc )
as part of the signature
while marketing means this is a good idea, which it isnt

but your question was too general, to give more qualified answer

> 
> (FUZZY_OCR=5.000)
> 
> The extract  from message header as seen by MS Outlook 2003.
> 
> Return-Path: <.......@....ee>
> Received: from MXR-3.estpak.ee (relay3.neti.ee [88.196.174.134])
>        by mbox1-1 (Cyrus v2.3.13) with LMTPA;
>        Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:42:25 +0000
> X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>       by MXR-3.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513F93FCE9E
>       for <....@..>; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:42:21 +0200 (EET)
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at estpak.ee
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Score: 5.501
> X-Spam-Level: *****
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.501 tagged_above=1 required=4.91
>       tests=[BAYES_00=-1, DC_IMAGE001_GIF=0.5, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE=1,
>       FUZZY_OCR=5.000, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
> Received: from MXR-3.estpak.ee ([127.0.0.1])
>       by localhost (MXR-3.estpak.ee [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
>       with ESMTP id YHLXDSU+bWgQ for <....@....ee>;
>       Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:42:15 +0200 (EET)
> X-SMTP-Auth-NETI-Businesmail: no
> Received: from smtp.uninet.ee (smtp.uninet.ee [194.204.0.4])
>       by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB48C2A5B52
>       for <....@...ee>; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:42:18 +0200 (EET)
> Received: from mail.it.ee (ns.it.ee [194.204.5.129])
>       by smtp.uninet.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5185661FC3
>       for <....@...ee>; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:42:18 +0200 (EET)
> From: ................
> To: yyy <....@online.ee>
> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:42:23 +0200
> Subject: ***SPAM*** RE: yyyyy arvuti
> Thread-Topic: yyyyyy arvuti
> Thread-Index: Acl/AD+57BamoUmoRFyuvncP2Cm/GgCLwAoAAAC6NrAAALZAIA==
> Message-ID: <aca3c89d34f71c4d9db842aa282b9fdf622c231...@tibu.corp.it.ee>
> References: <aca3c89d34f71c4d9db842aa282b9fdf622c231...@tibu.corp.it.ee>
>  <20090128102218.b3fb0d5...@relayhost3.neti.ee>
> In-Reply-To: <20090128102218.b3fb0d5...@relayhost3.neti.ee>
> Accept-Language: et-EE, en-US
> Content-Language: en-US
> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> acceptlanguage: et-EE, en-US
> Content-Type: multipart/related;
>       boundary="_004_ACA3C89D34F71C4D9DB842AA282B9FDF622C23149Etibucorpitee_";
>       type="multipart/alternative"
> MIME-Version: 1.0


-- 
Best Regards

MfG Robert Schetterer

Germany/Munich/Bavaria

Reply via email to