On 2/28/2009 9:20 AM, Matthias Leisi wrote:
In addition to what Karsten wrote about debian:
Michelle Konzack schrieb:
Received: from localhost (server7.pinguin-hosting.de [127.0.0.1])
by server7.pinguin-hosting.de (Postfix) with SMTP id D1EFC613E6
for <xxxxxxxx.bts4miche...@tamay-dogan.net>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:19:21
+0100 (CET)
Received: from master.debian.org (master.debian.org [70.103.162.29])
by server7.pinguin-hosting.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913EF59FF2
for <xxxxxxxx.bts4miche...@tamay-dogan.net>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:19:21
+0100 (CET)
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from
<bounces+20090226-xxxxxxxxxx.bts4michelle=tamay+2ddogan....@packages.qa.debian.org>)
id 1LcndY-00026z-C0
for xxxxxxxx.bts4miche...@tamay-dogan.net; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:19:20
+0000
Received: from powell.debian.org ([87.106.64.223]) by master.debian.org
with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <citati...@uncem.it>) id
1LcndX-00026J-89 for vim_cont...@packages.qa.debian.org; Thu,
26 Feb 2009 21:19:19 +0000
Received: from host77-252-dynamic.35-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it
([79.35.252.77] helo=xmbxcws.telecomitalia.it) by powell.debian.org
with
smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <citati...@uncem.it>) id
1LcndT-0005qV-Ff for v...@packages.debian.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:19:17
+0000
The chain is most likely Spammer > v...@packages... > Debian-internal
forwarding > your mailserver.
You should add the debian mailservers to your trust path
(trusted_networks/internal_networks depending on circumstances) so that
RBL checks are applied to the correct IP addresses.
Speaking of which, it may actually make sense to use all of dnswl.org's
entries as trusted_networks-entries...
Wouldn't that become huge and memory hungry??, (even excluding none & low)
Was wondering if the trusted_networks could be "pluginized" to use
DNSEval so that one could query a dnswl (local or remote) - for bigger
setups it would probably make management simpler.
just "wandering"....
