Jeff Mincy wrote:
Yow. The negative scoring bayes rules are extremely reliable when well
trained. Ham messages are not trying to evade the filter. Defeating
bayes with poison is mostly a myth. The random garbage might work the
first time but not the second time as long as you are training these
messages as spam. If you are getting lots of BAYES_00 hits on spam
then the problem is almost certainly incorrect training where spam
messages were incorrectly learned as ham.
Fair enough.
But the problem remains. A simple glance at this list shows that this
happens often enough to be a fairly common problem.
The question is: How does one fix the problem after it occurs?
Is there a FAQ page with step-by-step instructions a person could use?
--
Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes
chris-bar...@tamu.edu Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
Computer Systems Manager MSN IM: ch...@txbarnes.com
Department of Physics ph: 979-845-7801
Texas A&M University fax: 979-845-2590
