LuKreme wrote: > On 31-Mar-2009, at 11:13, Lucio Chiappetti wrote: >> And even resetting the AWL ... > > > Why would you reset the AWL? I can't see any circumstance on which that > would be a good idea.
In the absence of any sort of expire mechanism¹ (see, for example, https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6059) one can do a crude approximation by periodically resetting it. Yes, you lose a lot of history. But it’s no worse than not having it at all, which is what is due for 3.3.0. James. ¹ Unless one uses a real SQL database. -- E-mail: james@ | We're beginning to see the results of bringing a rubber aprilcottage.co.uk | chicken to a nuclear battle. | -- “Whitefang”, on groklaw.net
