On Mon, April 6, 2009 19:44, Savoy, Jim wrote: > Hi all, > I just noticed that we have had auto_whitelisting turned off > since 2005 (!). I just turned it > > back on (first deleting the auto_whitelist file in > /home/exim/.spamassassin (we run a site-wide > installation) and ensuring that file was re-created after > restarting spamd). It seems to be working.
so far so good > So now when I peruse the logs, I see the new tag AWL being added > for the first time. > But then I saw this fly by: > Apr 6 10:54:12 mx1-server spamd[12713]: spamd: result: Y 18 - > AWL, > BAYES_99, > DRUGS_ERECTILE, > FB_CIALIS_LEO3, > FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML, > FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS, > FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, > HTML_MESSAGE, > HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG, > MIME_HTML_ONLY, > MSGID_OUTLOOK_INVALID, > SPF_HELO_PASS, > SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_C, > UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, > URIBL_BLACK, > URIBL_JP_SURBL, > URIBL_SC_SURBL, > URIBL_WS_SURBL, > URIBL_ZEN > scantime=6.5,size=1206,user=nobody,uid=108,required_score=5.0, > rhost=localhost.localdomain, > raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=45215, > mid=<007401c4dc05$2105c210$7c07c...@gew>, > bayes=0.999996,autolearn=spam 127.0.0.1 is not remote host :/ did you send it for testing ? > It looks like it did everything correctly, giving the message a > high score (18) and autolearning if 127.0.0.1 indeed is remote yes > it in Bayes, but I was surprised to see the AWL tag get slapped > onto this one. Is that normal behaviour? make sure that exim do send remote ip to sa, else it will work badly, also that exim does not accept and bounce, i have seen it, if its spam then reject > We are running SpamAssassin 3.25. -- http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
