On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 17:36 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: > On Saturday 25 April 2009 16:31:38 Rik wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 06:47 -0600, LuKreme wrote: > > > On 25-Apr-2009, at 01:55, Rik wrote: > > > > Sadly I have discarded the mail, but the server time stamp and header > > > > stamp were within seconds of each other, so I don't think it's a time > > > > zone issue as such. > > > > > > Within seconds of each other including the TZ offset? > > > > would it be relevant if they are 8 hours ahead of the destination SA or > > is it too stupid to look at the offset? Hence the question - what is the > > rule looking at? I'm starting to think it may have been written by a > > retarded chimp. > > It would save us the guesswork if you could provide the header section > of the troublesome message. As Theo pointed out, there may be problem > in Received header fields inserted by your trusted mailer - not necessarily > a problem in the Date header field. This is not a single rule, but a code > section which tries to guess the actual timetamp at the moment of a > message reception. > > Mark > Thanks for the response Mark. I've sussed it. Whilst I binned the messages concerned I managed to find another one (pasted below) and I can easily see the problem in the headers now. Sanity is restored;
Received: from mail.caucasus.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.munged.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 79C392BF2B4 for <abarse...@munged.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:11:40 +0400 (GET) Received: from mail.caucasus.net (mail.caucasus.net [62.168.168.131]) by mx.munged.com with ESMTP id 8Sd65BVE6VAShNZt for <abarse...@munged.com>; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:11:40 +0400 (GET) Received: from localhost (relay [62.168.168.208]) by mail.caucasus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661FF3810AC for <abarse...@munged.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:11:40 +0400 (GET) Received: from mail.caucasus.net ([62.168.168.131]) by localhost (relay.caucasus.net [62.168.168.208]) (amavisd-new, port 10004) with ESMTP id U9a1cdneOGIs for <abarse...@munged.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:11:40 +0400 (GET) Received: from v (host-88-210-236-219.adsl.caucasus.net [88.210.236.219]) by mail.caucasus.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C17C38105A for <abarse...@munged.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:11:38 +0400 (GET) Message-ID: <f67d100cde8b4c059ab81fefd684d...@v> From: "Ia Peradze" <i...@nic.ge> To: "Alexander Barsegov" <abarse...@munged.com> References: <ebdc2591edb8204eb0b2a34ca36daa962faf4ae...@mailbox.munged.com> Subject: Re: orangecab.ge domain re-registration Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:05:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0255_01C9B3D6.CE788D30" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 Disposition-Notification-To: "Ia Peradze" <i...@nic.ge> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090402-0, 04/02/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.50 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 3.10 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12_2 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12_2 This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
