another alternative is to use SQL for bayes. --j.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:24, Michael Scheidell <scheid...@secnap.net> wrote: > > > Michael Grant wrote: > > I run spamassassin on my mail server from milter-spam > (http://www.snertsoft.com/sendmail/milter-spamc/). One mail server is > no longer sufficient for both reliability and load so I'm building 2 > identical mail servers (two mx mailers). > > > > aside from the issues of trying to COMBINE the bayes databases.. there is > also the issues of mx1 and mx2 (different weights) seeing a different world. > > many spammers go right for the highest weight mx record only. > > mx1 will see more legit email, and mx2 will see more spam. mx2 will start > to 'hate' everyone! > > I Don't think an hourly cron job would be needed, mostly nightly, and copy > the mx1 bayes to mx2. > > idealy, you could use a clustered set of servers, (clustering is NOT > replication) with in RAM db. > I don't think bayes and awl are that critical to go to that much trouble. > > > -- > Michael Scheidell, CTO > Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259 >> | SECNAP Network Security Corporation > > Certified SNORT Integrator > 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance > Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness > Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide > King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 > > ________________________________ > > This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap®. > For Information please see www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ > > ________________________________ >
