LuKreme wrote:
> On 15-May-2009, at 12:27, Jeremy Morton wrote:
>> It's unwanted e-mail, so it's pretty close to spam in my book.  Just
>> because it's some moron who bounced a message instead of someone
>> explicitly spamming me doesn't make it much better.
> 
> But it is NOT spam, which means that you screwing up the scores for
> BAYES based on these types of mail is simply screwing yourself.

Ooh, a can of worms!  Yum.

"Spam" is defined as a message that meets the following criteria:
1. Bulk message (including personalized auto-responders)
2. Unsolicited

So the new business contact who got your address from a mutual friend
sends you unsolicited mail, but it is not bulk and therefore not spam.
 This mailing list is bulk, but we all solicited it so it is not spam.

Backscatter from misdirected bounces is bulk AND unsolicited.
That means it is spam.

http://spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backscatter_spam
http://www.backscatterer.org/

The best 'solution' is to report it to SpamCop (not KnujOn as they
deal with spamvertised web sites' registrars rather than mail relays).
 SpamCop will contact the appropriate authorities and tell them that
these servers are misconfigured.



How we should treat backscatter in Bayes is another issue.  One must
recall that Bayes is REALLY REALLY smart.  I've found that it actually
does the right thing after training backscatter as spam and legit
bounces as ham.  Sure enough, backscatter gets marked as >50% and
legit bounces get marked as <50%.  It certainly helps that I've
configured internal_networks, bumped ALL_TRUSTED, and I use vBounce
correctly.

I think I've posted this before, but:


score ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE        0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3         # def: 0.1
score BOUNCE_MESSAGE            0.4 0.5 0.9 1.0         # def: 0.1
score VBOUNCE_MESSAGE           0.4 0.5 0.9 1.0         # def: 0.1

header __VACATION Subject =~
/\b(?:vacatio|away|out.of.offic|auto.?re|confirm)/i
# https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6008
header   __BUGZILLA_DAEMON      From =~ /bugzilla/i
meta KHOP_BACKSCATTER !ALL_TRUSTED && !DKIM_VERIFIED && !__VACATION &&
!__BUGZILLA_DAEMON && (BOUNCE_MESSAGE||VBOUNCE_MESSAGE)
describe KHOP_BACKSCATTER        Misdirected bounce to a forged sender
address
score KHOP_BACKSCATTER           6.9


I reject at 8.0 and mark at 5.0, so this pretty much kills all of my
company's backscatter.  Anything that's DKIM_VERIFIED should have
admins responsive to SpamCop's spam reports.

Reply via email to