On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:10:36 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> On 30.06.09 07:06, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > > Are you saying that ZEN caught it after SA processed it? Why are > > you not using ZEN in SA or at the SMTP stage? > > She apparently does not have control over 69.43.203.202, which is not > listed, but 174.146.118.224 is. 69.43.203.202 is apparently in her > internal_networks because 174.146.118.224 is listed in the PBL which > is checked only on internal network boundary... And note also that it was authenticated, it was a mail submission, so PBL should not have been run against it.
