On Mon, July 6, 2009 00:57, MySQL Student wrote: > spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint >> search here for missing perl modules > How effective are razor/pyzor and SPF/DKIM? I've always been a bit hesitant > to use any of those.
well it helps, if used properly, how thay works is depending on your need and configs pyzor is digest razor is digest ixhash is digest spf / dkim is dns based, just littele diff in that dkim checks signed key on dns and in recieved mail, point is that you can use this as whitelist_auth whitelist_from_dkim whitelist_from_spf on u...@foo.tld you really trust to not send spam >> and the spam mail have all_trusted ?, you trust a spammer in >> trusted_networks > trusted_networks isn't at all defined. It looks like it was previously > defined with just 127.0.0.1, localhost is always trusted now, silly no spammer exists in localhost sa wice :) spam exists everywhere, it just depends on what is spam > but it's now commented out. What should it be? good question, i have very minimal set trusted network to all my wan ip not including 127.0.0.1, and all isp i know send me forwared email is also added here, this prevent false spf hits for dkim this does no change, either it verify or not > You are referring to the spamassassin trusted_networks, not postfix, right? yes, postfix have no trusted_networks, but this sa table can be shared, but i cant find a good reason to -- xpoint
