> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 05:01:14PM +0200, Jonas Eckerman wrote: > > Steven W. Orr wrote: > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ClamAVPlugin > > > >> It looks like what I thought I wanted already exists. Based on what I wrote > >> above, and that I like the result of running sa + clamav via the two > >> milters, > >> does anyone have any caveats for me? > > > > 1: When running ClamAV inside SA you have to run SA even if ClamAV finds > > a virus. This requires more resources than just ClamAV. And ClamAV is > > way faster and requires far less than SA does.
On 10.07.09 19:09, Henrik K wrote: > When you block botnets directly from MTA (zen, helo checks, greylist etc), > possible ClamAV/SA load is already reduced by a huge factor. Personally I > only see handful of official ClamAV signatures hitting per 100k hams, so > the scanning order wouldn't really matter. It does, if you receive much of mail. If you don't, you can surely call clamav and spamassassin (not spamc) from your .procmailrc as well but I still won't recommend that. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
