Am 2009-07-15 16:00:13, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 06:34 -0700, Evan Platt wrote: > > >but quite a lot of spam gets through by using arbitrary addresses in the To > > >field and a 'good' address in the Envelope-to field. > > > > > >How can I rectify this? > > > > Why is your MTA not verifying addresses, and rejecting mail to non > > valid addresses? > > This doesn't apply here, since the OP said the Envelope To is valid. > > The mail's To header is just syntactic sugar. For example, you want to > receive this very mail, despite it not showing any address valid at your > MX in the To header, right? ;)
Because I do not know how he filter and how he has embedded SA in his
setup, I do in procmail:
:0
* ^Envelope-To:.*linux4miche...@blahblah
* ^(To|Cc):.*linux4miche...@blahblah
/dev/null
This catch more then 600 messages a day...
No serieux sender use "undisclosed-recipients" of send
messages to my box with a "To: assh...@my_domain.net".
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
<http://www.tamay-dogan.net/> Michelle Konzack
<http://www.can4linux.org/> c/o Vertriebsp. KabelBW
<http://www.flexray4linux.org/> Blumenstrasse 2
Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de 77694 Kehl/Germany
IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) Tel. DE: +49 177 9351947
ICQ #328449886 Tel. FR: +33 6 61925193
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
