Le dimanche 9 août 2009 06:52:49, vous avez écrit : > Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: > > Hi SAs, > > > > Well, after reading this link > > http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/sa-learn.html I'm still > > looking for an easy-way to let my mortal users to train our antispam. I > > was thinking a mailbox such as h...@antispamserver and > > s...@antispamserver to let users to forward their false positivos or > > their false netgatives. In isde each box (ham or spam), of course a > > procmail with sa-learn input will be forwarded. > > > > My doubts are nexts: > > 1. Will forwarded mails be usefull for training, I mean if spam was: > > From: spa...@example.net To: u...@mydomain, when forwarding it will > > be From: mu...@mydomain To: s...@antispamserver. Change of this and > > forwarding (getting rid of headers because mail-clients) wont change > > learning? > > Forwarded mails are NOT useful. > > You also neglected to mention the change of Received headers, and pretty > much every header in the message, the re-encoding of the body by your > mail client, etc. > > Since SA's bayes tokenizes headers, that's disastrous. > > > 2. If technique in question 1 is usless, what other way would be nice to > > let user to report a false positive/negative for training. > > In some cases you can have the client forward as attachment, and use a > mailbox that strips attachments and feeds them to sa-learn. As long as > the client being used forwards the entire original message, with > complete headers, this should work fine. > > > TIA > > > > LD
I understand and if I use altemime to add a link, to identify email in a quarantine? will tex in altermime change learning?
