On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:51:46 +0200 Per Jessen <p...@computer.org> wrote:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > another serious question: should IPs with statically assigned IP > > addresses get the same processing as if they were dynamically > > assigned? > > Probably not, but there's no guaranteed way of telling them apart. > > > Of course it's much better to have personalised DNS name than > > generic one, but *DYNAMIC* should still not match, becausse the ip > > is just not dynamic. > > How do you know that? Presumably because the reverse DNS contains "STATIC" The SORBS DUL listing criteria contains this line: "Generic reverse DNS naming is the most important criterion for determining if an address range should be considered dynamically assigned." I think that makes sense, there are plenty of ordinary domestic Windows boxes running on static addresses - it means practically nothing.
