On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:47 -0600, Savoy, Jim wrote:
> > Karsten wrote:
> > None. As I mentioned earlier today on this list, auto-learning does
> > neither take Bayes nor AWL into account.
>
> Ok thanks Karsten. I guess the change to -3.0 for ham is the only cause
> of my corpus coming into balance. Good to know.
Yup, definitely.
Also, I do agree with the post by RW. By lowering the auto-learn ham
threshold you managed to get the ratio more sane. However, continuing to
do so you won't really learn any ham, but spam only.
Raising the threshold back to the default likely would be a good idea,
and occasionally lower to get the effect you just observed: Get the
ratio back to somewhat balanced.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
