On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 12:24 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: > ----- "Clunk Werclick" <mailbacku...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > | On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 11:46 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > | > > > On 12-Sep-2009, at 10:27, Clunk Werclick wrote: > | > > > > I disagree. It can do as much harm as good. My own view and > | > > > > observation from the past have rendered it pointless in my > | context. It > | > > > > adds latency, is easily poisoned and rarely makes much > | difference to > | > > > > the score. I do appreciate some people like it, but my own > | view is > | > > > > spam has moved on beyond the point of it being useful. > | > > | > > On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 16:37 -0600, LuKreme wrote: > | > > > Facts? we don't need no pesky facts. You are very misinformed. > | > > | > On 14.09.09 08:48, Clunk Werclick wrote: > | > > Myself, I've seen some very poor Bayesian databases where users > | have > | > > been allowed to categorize mail as spam-v-ham. One company who > | deal with > | > > Pharmaceuticals for famine relief in Uganda and other poor > | African > | > > countries found bayes to mess with their core mail to a point that > | made > | > > it worthless in their context. > | > > | > I would say that is a result of badly trained BAYES, not fgrom its > | bad > | > design. > | > > | > If you insist on not using bayes, just because it can be mistrained, > | better > | > don't use any configurable software, because _everything_ > | configurable will go wrong > | > if miscongured. > | > | The *issue* with bayes is it *can* have user input. Would you trust > | your > | users influencing system wide policy? > | > | I've already stated I'll try it. So read the xxxxxx follow up before > | shouting your thick foreign mouth off you stupid xxxx! > | > If the OP cannot refrain from that sort of foul language when presented with > counter arguments then please ban. The list would be far happier IMHO. Then stop off list mailing me you thick cunt and tell someone that fucking cares. > > BR, > -- ----------------------------------------------------------- C Werclick .Lot Technical incompetent Loyal Order Of The Teapot.
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only to be used as an e-mail and an attachment. Any use of it for other purposes other than as an e-mail and an attachment will not be covered by any warranty that may or may not form part of this e-mail and attachment.
