RE: Incresing numbers of DCC_CHECK in ham

[R-Elists]

 


> 
> Probably because you are not short-circuiting on the whitelist. ;)
> 
> Any whitelist rule is just that -- a plain, ordinary rule. 
> With a score.
> There is no magic, and other matching rules always can 
> overrule any other fraction of the equation.
> 
> If you *know* a given message is not spam, you can just as 
> well spare the cycles calling SA on it -- and have your glue 
> avoid SA for those.
> 

Karsten,

is it in the SA docs where to specifically put ALL (or most) whitelist rules
and how to specifically shortcircuit them correctly??

is it done with priority?

or should be local.cf and blah?

...or some other way to be first in the rule chain etc?

or a specifcally labeled rulename.cf and blah?

:-)

 - rh