On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:38:14 +0300 Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi> wrote:
> > SpamAssassin *is* extremely hard to get up and running, when one is > using a Windows workstation without perl. Even with perl it is hard, > as the spamd can not be put up with anything there is. I think even > cygwin does not help there. To be fair you don't actually need spamd if you are using SpamAssassin client side with a modest amount of mail. >I have tried to compile spamd for cygwin, > but could not make it. I would have used it as one spamd instance in > my LAN in addition to the working Linux ones, spamd is perl, it's spamc that's compiled C, and you wouldn't need that in the scenario you describe.
