On 12-Nov-2009, at 10:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: BB >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: BBI >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: BBII >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: BBS >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: BBSI >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: BI >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: BII >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: BIII >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: BIS >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: IB >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: II >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: III >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: IIK >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: IIS >> spamd[10989]: prefork: child states: IIZ >> spamd[10989]: spamd: handled cleanup of child >> spamd[10989]: spamd: server successfully spawned child >> >> (based on a sort -u of the current maillog) > > If you do this over all week, you can safely restrict max number of spamd > processes to 5. If you have enough of memory, you can use higher number but > you surely don't need more then default values for max-spare (2) and > min-spare (1) spamd processes
I guess I just don't understand what these various notes mean. II? BB? BBSI? -- And there were all the stars, looking remarkably like powered diamonds spilled on black velvet, the stars that lured and ultimately called the boldest towards them... --Colour of Magic
