On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:46 PM, jdow <j...@earthlink.net> wrote: > From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-li...@cybernothing.org> > Sent: Monday, 2009/November/23 13:37 > > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:14 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> You should complain to ReturnPath. Iirc, HABEAS used to sue spammers >> misusing their technology. Don't know if ReturnPath continues prac ticing >> this. > > Actually, you're confusing Habeas's first technology (which involved suing > misuse of their copywritten header, and was abandoned years ago) with their > "safe list" whitelist product, which Return Path now operates. Rather than > suing them, we'll simply kick 'em off the list if they don't meet our > standards. > > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI has some > basic info, including an address to complain at if you're receiving spam > from a safelisted IP. > > -- > J.D. Falk <jdf...@returnpath.net> > Return Path Inc > > > > As a sort of intolerant b**ch is my interpretation of what you just > said as "Habeas is useless" a reasonable statement? If not, why not? > > {^_^} Habeas gets a zero score here now. >
Habeas accredited spam has been getting a positive score here for some years. -Aaron
