> On tir 01 dec 2009 02:16:04 CET, wrote >> I believe Raymond's response was addressing the fact a server >> connection could possibly be interrupted before it had a chance to >> issue the SMTP QUIT command. I would think being listed for that alone >> would be ridiculous.
On 01.12.09 02:20, Benny Pedersen wrote: > if its this i would agree, cant exim see diff in not sending quit or > drop connection ? > > postfix have lost connection, spam sign ? It may depend on the number of lost connections. Marc said he's investigating the problem, let's see the result -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way.
