Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On tir 01 dec 2009 02:16:04 CET, wroteI believe Raymond's response was addressing the fact a server connection could possibly be interrupted before it had a chance to issue the SMTP QUIT command. I would think being listed for that alone would be ridiculous.On 01.12.09 02:20, Benny Pedersen wrote:if its this i would agree, cant exim see diff in not sending quit or drop connection ?postfix have lost connection, spam sign ?It may depend on the number of lost connections. Marc said he's investigating the problem, let's see the result Every list is imperfect. In this case there were about 10 hits on the hi MX record and they didn't use QUIT to close the connection. Generally this indicates a virus. If they had used QUIT they wouldn't have been listed. Although I try to keep the list perfect, if an email server impersonates a spam bot then they are more likely to get on the wrong lists. |
- Re: FP on blacklist hostkarma Michael Monnerie
- Re: FP on blacklist hostkarma Alex
- Re: FP on blacklist hostkarma Michael Monnerie
- Re: FP on blacklist hostkarma Marc Perkel
- Re: FP on blacklist hostkarma Michael Monnerie
- Re: FP on blacklist hostkarma Raymond Dijkxhoorn
- Re: FP on blacklist hostkarma Benny Pedersen
- Re: FP on blacklist hostkarma d . hill
- Re: FP on blacklist hostkarma Benny Pedersen
- Re: FP on blacklist hostk... Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: FP on blacklist hostk... Marc Perkel
- Re: FP on blacklist hostk... Michael Monnerie
- Re: FP on blacklist hostk... Marc Perkel
- Re: FP on blacklist hostk... Kevin Golding
- Re: FP on blacklist hostk... Marc Perkel
- Re: FP on blacklist hostk... Kevin Golding
- Re: FP on blacklist hostk... Kai Schaetzl
- Re: FP on blacklist hostk... LuKreme
- HTML in Messages Marc Perkel
- Re: HTML in Messages Benny Pedersen
- Re: HTML in Messages Karl Pearson