On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 04:16 -0800, jdow wrote:
> From: "Yet Another Ninja" <sa-l...@alexb.ch>
> Sent: Friday, 2009/December/04 02:28
>
>
> > On 12/4/2009 10:57 AM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > > FINAL
> >> This is not a social club, it's a question and issues list for
> >> Spamassassin. My question and issue is why, by default, does
> >> Spamassassin use the HABEAS white list, and why is it out of the box set
> >> with a score to favour delivery of their junk? It's a fair question. The
> >> answer 'just change the score' is not the correct answer.
> >
> > the answer is totally correct. SA is a framework, which luckily allows
> > YOU do whatever you want with it, so please do, whatever YOU want (that
> > does not include beating a dead horse on the list) and move on.
> >
> >> The correct answer will be precisely why this state of affairs exists.
> >
> > - because developers think/have thought its a good idea.
> >
> > - because nobody other than you makes such a noise about it. And YOU who
> > are so against, have you submitted a bug to have whatever reconsidered.
> >
> > EOT
>
> Heh, at this site procaine sits in front of SA. It has a few email
> addresses, a very few, redirected to their own folders that I check
> any time I want some "amusement of that kind." I want to find out just
> how much Richard qualifies for this dubious honor.
>
> {^_-}
Qualifies what, that I get UBE that is Habeas Accredited? Should I start
with the 40 from 'DateTheuk' in the last 8 days?
That's 40 to many - would you like to talk in hundreds and thousands to
justify removal or changing of a default white list score?
